 |
| Gypsy Moth Slow the Spread Foundation, Inc. |
5111 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite A15 |
| Raleigh, NC 27609 |
| |
Mail Address
PO Box 58220 |
| Raleigh, NC 27658 |
| |
| Ph: 919.877.9392 |
| Fx: 919.877.0940 |
|
Publications
Provided here is a list of the core publications
covering some of the methodologies used in the Slow the Spread
of the Gypsy Moth Project. Also included are some papers that
provide a history of gypsy moth in North America, and others
that provide a conceptual base, scientific rational, and/or
ramifications of various strategies of gypsy moth management.
Key methodology papers include those authored by Sharov et
al. representing many of the elements of slowing the spread
of gypsy moth. Also, see the overview paper entitled " Slow
the Spread: a national program to contain the gypsy moth".
Many of the papers are in Adobe PDF format - you will need
the free Adobe
Reader to view these files. |
| (
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
O P Q R S T U V
W X Y Z ) |
| |
G
|
| |
|
| |
| Leonard, D. S. and A. A. Sharov. 1995.
Slow the Spread project update: developing a process
for evaluation. Pp. 82-85. In: Proceedings. U.S.
Dep. Agric. interagency gypsy moth research forum 1995. USDA
For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-213. |
| Leonhardt, B.
A., V. C. Mastro, D. S. Leonard, W. McLane, R. C. Reardon,
and
K. W. Thorpe. 1996. Control
of low-density gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)
populations by mating disruption
with pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 22:
1255-1272. |
| Leuschner, W.
A., J. A. Young, S. A. Walden, and F. W. Ravlin. 1996.
Potential benefits of slowing the gypsy moth's spread. Southern
Journal of Applied. Forestry. 20: 65-73. |
| Liebhold, A. and M. McManus. 1999.
The evolving use of insecticides in gypsy moth management.
Journal of Forestry. 97: 20-23. |
| Liebhold, A. M. and P. C. Tobin. 2006. Growth of newly established
alien populations: comparison of North American gypsy moth colonies
with invasion theory. Special Feature: Population Ecology of
Biological Invasions, Population Ecology 48: 253-262. |
| Liebhold, A., V. Mastro, and Paul
W. Schaefer. 1989. Learning from the legacy
of Leopold Trouvelot. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 35: 20-21. |
| Liebhold, A. M., K. W. Gottschalk
D. A. Mason, R. R. Bush. 1997. Evaluation
of Forest Susceptibility to the Gypsy Moth across the
Conterminous United States.
J. Forestry. 95: 20-24. |
| Liebhold, A. M., K. W. Gottschalk,
E. R. Luzader, D. A. Mason, R. Bush and D. B. Twardus. 1997.
Gypsy moth in the United States: An Atlas. USDA
Forest Service General Technical Report NE-233. 33 pp. |
| Libehold Andrew M. 1992. Are
North American populations of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera:
Lymantriidae) bimodal? Environmental Entomology,
21: 221-229. |
| Liebhold Andrew M, Halverson JA, and Elmes
GA. 1992. Gypsy
moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis. Journal
of Biogeography, 19(5): 513-520. |
| Liebhold Andrew
M, Luzader E, Reardon R, Bullard A, Roberts A, Ravlin
W, Delost S, and Spears
B. 1996. Use of a geographic information system
to evaluate regional treatment effects in a gypsy moth
(Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) management program. Journal
of Economic Entomology. 89(5): 1192-1203. |
| Liebhold Andrews
M, Macdonald W. L., Bergdahl D., and Mastro V. C. 1995. Invasion
by exotic forest pests: a threat to forest ecosystems.
Forest Science Monographs. 30, 49p. |
| Liebhold Andrew M, Rossi
RE, and Kemp WP. 1993. Geostatistics
and geographic information systems in applied insect
ecology. Annual Review of Entomology. 38:
303-327. |
| Liebhold Andrew M, Luzader
E, Reardon R, Bullard A, Roberts A, Ravlin W, Delost
S, and Spears B. 1996. Use
of a geographic information system to evaluate regional
treatment effects in a gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)
management program. Journal of Economic Entomology. 89(5):
1192-1203. |
| Liebhold Andrew M, Luzader
E, Reardon R, Roberts A, Ravlin FW, Sharov A, and Zhou
G. 1998. Forecasting
gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) defoliation
with a geographical information system. Journal
of Economic Entomology. 91(2): 464-472. |
| Liebhold Andrew M, Elkinton
J, Williams D, and Muzika RM. 2000. What
causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Population
Ecology. 42:257-266. |
|
| |
| Mayo, J. H., T. J. Straka,
R. D. Hedden, and D. S. Leonard. 1997. Projections
of costs and benefits associated with an operational
STS strategy.
In Proc. 1996 Annual Gypsy Moth Review (Annapolis,
Md.; Nov. 18-21, 1996) 134-135. |
| Mayo, J. H., T. J. Straka, R. L. Hedden, and
D. S. Leonard. The cost of monitoring the
spread of gypsy moth in the eastern United States:
R. A. Kluender M. M. Corrigan N. B. Smith. Valuing
non-timber forest resources: timber primacy is passeâ™.
Proceedings 1997 Southern Forest Economics Workers
Meeting. Little Rock, AR 19-21 March 1997. 108-113. |
| Mayo, J. H., T. J. Straka,
and D. S. Leonard. 2003.
The Cost of Slowing the Spread of the Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera:
Lymantriidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. Vol.
96, No. 5, pp. 1448-1454. |
McFadden, M. W. and M. E.
McManus. 1991. An insect out of control?
The potential for spread and establishment of the
gypsy moth in new forest areas in the United States.
Pages 172-186 in Y. N. Baranchikov, W. J. Mattson,
F. P. Hain, and T. L. Payne, eds. Forest insect guilds:
patterns of interaction with host trees. USDA For.
Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE 153.
|
| McManus, M. L. and T. McIntyre. 1981.
Introduction. Pages 1-7 in C. C. Doane and M. L. McManus,
eds. The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest
management. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical
Bulletin 1584. |
|
| |
| Reardon, R. C. 1991. Appalachian gypsy-moth
integrated pest-management project. For. Ecol. and
Manage. 39: 107-112. |
| Reardon, R. C., D. S. Leonard,
V. C. Mastro, B. A. Leonhardt, W. McLane, S. Talley,
K. Thorpe, and R. Webb. 1998. Using mating
disruption to manage gypsy moth: a review. USDA
Forest Service FHTET-98-01. 85 pp. |
| Régnière Jacque, and Sharov AA. 1998. Phenology
of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)
male flight and the effect of moth dispersal in heterogeneous
landscapes. International Journal of Biometeorology,
41: 161-168. |
|
| |
| Schweitzer Dale F. 2004.
Gypsy moth (Lymantria
dispar): Impacts and Options for Biodiversity-Oriented
Land Managers. 59 pages. NatureServe: Arlington,
Virginia. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Roberts
EA, Liebhold AM, and Ravlin FW. 1995. Gypsy
moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) spread in the central
Appalachians: three methods for species boundary estimation. Environmental
Entomology. 24(6): 1529-1538. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Liebhold
AM, and Ravlin FW. 1995. Prediction
of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) mating success
from pheromone trap counts. Environmental Entomology. 24(5):
1239-1244. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Liebhold
AM, and Roberts EA. 1996. Methods
for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera:
Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains. Journal
of Economic Entomology. 90(5): 1259-1266. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Liebhold
AM, and Roberts EA. 1996. Spatial
variation among counts of gypsy moths (Lepidoptera:
Lymantriidae) in pheromone-baited traps at expanding
population fronts. Environmental Entomology. 25(6):
1312-1320. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Liebhold
AM, and Roberts EA. 1996. Spread
of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in the central
Appalachians: comparison of population boundaries obtained
from male moth capture, egg mass counts, and defoliation
records. Environmental Entomology. 25(4):
783-792. |
| Sharov Alexei A, and Colbert
JJ. 1996. A
model for testing hypotheses of gypsy moth, Lymantria
dispar L., population dynamics. Ecological
Modelling. 84: 31-51. |
| Sharov Alexei A. 1996. Modelling
forest insect dynamics. In Caring for
the forest: research in a changing world. E. Korpilahti,
H. Mukkela and T. Salonen (eds.). Congress report.
Vol. II. IUFRO XX World Congress. Gummerus Printing,
Jyvaskyla, Finland. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Liebhold
AM, and Roberts EA. 1997. Correlation
of counts of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)
in pheromone traps with landscape characterstics. Forest
Science. 43(4): 483-490. |
| Sharov Alexei A, and Liebhold
AM. 1998. Model
of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)
with a barrier zone. Ecological Applications. 8(4):
1170-1179. |
| Sharov Alexei A, and Liebhold
AM. 1998. Bioeconomics
of managing the spread of exotic pest species with
barrier zones. Ecological Applications. 8(3):
833-845. |
| Sharov Alexei A, and Liebhold AM. 1998. Quantitative
analysis of gypsy moth spread in the central Appalachians. In Population
and Community Ecology for Insect Management and Conservation, Baumärtner
et al. (eds.), Balkema, Rotterdam. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Liebhold
AM, and Roberts EA. 1998. Optimizing
the use of barrier zones to slow the spread of gypsy
moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America. Journal
of Economic Entomology. 91(1): 165-174. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Pijanowski
BC, Liebhold AM, and Gage SH. 1999. What
affects the rate of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)
spread: winter temperature or forest susceptibility? Agricultural
and Forest Entomology. 1: 37-45. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Leonard
D, Liebhold AM, and Clemens NS. 2002. Evaluation
of preventative treatments in low-density gypsy moth
populations using pheromone traps. Journal
of Economic Entomology. 95(6): 1205-1215. |
| Sharov Alexei A, Leonard
D, Liebhold AM, Roberts EA, and Dickerson W. 2002. Slow
the spread: a national program to contain the gypsy
moth. Journal of Forestry. 100(5): 30-35. |
|
|
| Tcheslavskaia Ksenia S., Brewster C., Thorpe K., Sharov A., Leonard D. and A. Roberts. 2005. Effects of intentional gaps in spray coverage on the efficacy of
gypsy moth mating disruption. J. Appl. Entomol. 129 (9/10), 475-480. |
| Tcheslavskaia Ksenia S., Thorpe K.
, Brewster C., Sharov A., Leonard D., Reardon R., Mastro V., Sellers P. and Roberts EA. 2005. Optimization of pheromone dosage for gypsy moth
mating disruption. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.
115: 355–361. |
| Thorpe, K. W., Hickman, A.D., Tcheslavskaia, K.S., Leonard, D.S.,
Roberts, E.A. 2007. Comparison of methods for deploying female gypsy
moths to evaluate mating disruption treatments. Agricultural and
Forest Entomology 9: 31-37. |
| Thorpe, K. W., Tcheslavskaia, K.S., Tobin. P.C., Blackburn, L.M., Leonard, D.S., Roberts, E.A. 2007. Persistent effects of aerial applications of disparlure on gypsy moth trap catch and mating success. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 125: 223-229. |
| Thorpe, K. W.,
D. S. Leonard, V. C. Mastro, W. McLane, R. C. Reardon,
P. Sellers, R.
E. Webb, and S. E. Talley. 2000. Effectiveness
of gypsy moth mating disruption from aerial applications
of plastic laminate
flakes with and without a sticking agent. Agricultural
and Forest Entomology. 2: 225-231. |
| Thorpe, K. W.,
R. Reardon, K. Tcheslavskaia, D. Leonard, and V. Mastro. 2006. A review of the use of mating disruption to manage gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). FHTET-2006-13. Morgantown, WV: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team. 76 p. |
| Thorpe, K. W.,
V. C. Mastro, D. S. Leonard, B. A. Leonhardt, W. McLane,
R. C. Reardon, and S. E. Talley. 1999. Comparative
efficacy of two controlled-release gypsy moth mating
disruption formulations. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 90:
267-277. |
| Tobin, P. C., A. A. Sharov, A. M. Liebhold, D. S. Leonard, E. A.
Roberts, and M. R. Learn. 2004. Management of the gypsy moth through a
decision algorithm under the Slow the Spread Project. Feature Article,
The American Entomologist. 50: 200-209. |
| Tobin, P. C., A. M. Liebhold, and E. A. Roberts. 2007. Comparison of
methods for estimating the spread of a non-indigenous species. Journal
of Biogeography 34: 305-312. |
Tobin, P. C. and Laura M. Blackburn, eds. 2007. Slow the Spread: a national program to manage the gypsy moth. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-6. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 109 p. |
| Tobin, P. C. and S. L. Whitmire. 2005. Spread of gypsy moth and
its relationship to defoliation. Environmental Entomology 34:
1448-1455. |
| Tobin, P. C., S. L. Whitmire, D. M. Johnson, O. N. Bjørnstad, and A.
M. Liebhold. 2007. Invasion speed is affected by geographic variation
in the strength of Allee effects. Ecology Letters 10: 36-43. |
|
|
| United States
Department of Agriculture. 1995.
Gypsy Moth Management in the United States: a cooperative approach. Final
Environmental Impact Statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
